Showing posts with label Comedy/Horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comedy/Horror. Show all posts

Saturday, March 31, 2018

John Dies At The End (2012)


Directed by Don Coscarelli
Run time: 99 minutes

This movie came about because of a love of the Phantasm movie franchise and a love of zombie novels. David Wong (real name Jason Pargin ) is the author of John Dies at the End and a massive fan of the Phantasm movies. According to the forward Don Coscarelli wrote for John Dies at the End, his favorite guilty pleasure is reading zombie novels.When an online book retailer suggested that Don Coscarelli would like to read a book with meat demons, parasites with plans of planetary domination, weird parallel dimensions, bratwurst cellphone, and a street drug called soy sauce that gives the user all kinds of weird abilities. Leading Coscarelli to buy the book, devour the book, and turn the book into a weird fun film.

Like the book, the movie opens with the riddle of the universe. The riddle is this, the guy who you shot a few months ago comes back and kicks your door in. You grab the ax purchased and take the guy out again. In the process of defending yourself you break the handle and have to go back to the store with a bullshit story about the blood stains on the handle. Armed with a fixed ax you go home to find an inter-dimensional slug thing in your kitchen. Taking your ax you proceed to kill the thing and notch the head on your kitchen table. So back to the store, another bullshit story, and a new ax head. Returning home you find the guy you killed twice back again, his sewn back on with hedge trimmer wire, and looking for a rematch. He also is looking at you like your the guy who killed and that is the ax that did the job. Is he right, is that the same ax that killed him?

The story is centered around John and Dave. Two college drop outs that after being exposed to the drug soy sauce have been chosen to be defenders of Earth and Earths in parallel dimensions. With the aid of Marconi (Clancy Brown), a infomercial guru with supernatural powers, these two screw ups go on a strange adventure to save Earth from a bizarre invasion. The reason for this invasion sis the drug soy sauce. Aside from giving people strange supernatural powers, it's alive, and can act as a gateway for creatures to go from one reality to the next. Because of this a parasite with track record of destroying worlds and our slackers are the only ones destined to somehow step up and be the big damn heroes.

Overall this is a fun but incredibly strange movie. There are some issues with the movie because of the off the wall insanity. Best example of this is Dave uses soy sauce to go back in time to prevent his own murder. It is insanely clever use of time travel but part way through his time travel trip Dave ends up in some post apocalyptic nightmare for no reason. Other than that, the film has sold preferences by it's cast. There is a cameo by Phantasm's own Tall Man Angus Scrimm as the last priest you would want to talk to on a exorcism hotline.

I highly recommend John Dies at the End if your a fan of crude humor, general weirdness, and bizarrely amusing horror movies. Though this is a movie review I also highly recommending the book as well.

MVT: The scene that shows how this society dealt with people who did not except this organic A.I. as their overlord. Because the historic record was too graphic for John and Dave to comprehend the society made an incredibly graphic and violent cartoon to show a graphic and bloody purge.

Make or Break: What made it for me was Dave's character arc. He grows and changes as a character but he never stops being cynical jerk.

Score: 7.5 out of 10

 

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Blood Shot (2013)


Directed by: Dietrich Johnston
Run Time: 96 minutes

All you had to do was be entertaining movie. One simple job that you were well equipped to carry out. You had explosions, guns, a stupid premise to use guns and explosions, and a vampire. Instead you pass off shit writing as comedy and any joy that could be found is beaten to death with horrible direction. Let's get through this trainwreck.

The story is centered around Detective Hellsing. A cop who has devoted his life to destroying evil by destroying his marriage, being a joke with other cops, and learning how to kill vampires from websites online. Why did he become the self appointed guardian against evil? That is never addressed as Detective Hellsing gets anonymous tip where the vampire will strike next. Across town an Islamic terrorist cell is getting ready to carry out a round of suicide bombing in various US cities. Before the cell can spread terror throughout America the vampire shows up and wipes out the terror cell.

Detective Hellsing enters the scene just as the last terrorist is killed. The detective enacts his mission of destroying evil by using a grab bag of vampire lore and seeing what will work. Silver bullets hurt the vampire, crucifixes can repel and injure, and a wooden stake to the heart and sunlight are lethal. After throwing the detective around for a bit, the vampire activates all the explosives in the building and flees the scene. Leaving Detective Hellsing to escape the as the building explodes.

The nameless vampire works for the C.I.A.'s vampire division. Which is a dark office set were Lance Henriksen is chain smoking. The current target that President Christopher Lambert wants eliminated is a terrorist master mind with a bad joke name that everyone just call him Bob. Bob, played by Brad Dourif, is assembling a super league of terrorists to destroy America and it's vampire assassin. Bob has acquired a powerful jinn/djinn and has smuggled his terrorist pals, his harem, and five little people who are expert miners with student visas.

Meanwhile Detective Hellsing's life has gotten worse. His vampire obsession has gotten him fired, his wife is ready to move from trial separation to full on divorce, and the league of super terrorist have kidnapped his soon to be ex wife. So Mr. Hellsing sets aside his war on evil and teams up with the vampire to rescue his soon to be ex wife and defeat the terrorists. However this plays right into the super terrorists plans as they need the vampire to be the host for the jinn. The jinn is used to steals some material to make a weapon of mass destruction and Mr Hellsing is forced to return the jinn to his prison.

It looks like the heroes are going to save the day when an explosion fatally wounds Mr. Hellsing and the vampire. The vampire bites Mr. Hellsing making him into a vampire and to reveal the plot twist of the movie. The vampire was the anonymous source as a means of training Mr. Hellsing as the vampire's replacement. With all the dumb exposition out of the way, the vampire dies and Mr. Hellsing becomes the big damn hero (TM) and saves the day.

 This was a dumb movie. The jokes were badly written, badly executed, and only there to pad out the run time. At some point in the creative process they was an interesting movie but the writer/director managed to screw it up. Christopher Lambert's scenes are shot in a limo and feels like it was filmed as he was on his way to airport to get the away from this movie. Lance Henriksen's scenes feel more like he just stopped giving a fuck and just wanted his day of filming to be over. Brad Dourif and the rest of the cast did their best with the shoddy plot but there is not enough polish in the world to make shit look like gold. If you find this movie please avoid it. It's joyless, flawed, and a mess of a movie.

MVT: Towards the end of the film there is some impressive practical effects. Yes I am reaching for something of value on this movie.

Make or Break: Three things broke this movie. A plot that brings up and forgets things in favour of making a dumb joke. The vampire who can't make up his mind if he's a bad ass assassin or Sam the Eagle from The Muppets. And using CGI as a crutch instead of a tool.

Score: 0.5 out of 10





Monday, June 12, 2017

Bloody Bloody Bible Camp (2012)






Directed by: Vito Trabucco
Run Time:  90 Minutes

This movie was being advertised on Twitter and like forty percent of the weirdness on that service it of course was brought to my attention. So I checked out the trailer, carried out the hunt for a retailer that had it and shipped to Canada, and once I owned it I promptly forgot about it. Which really was a disservice to this film as it is a fun, crude, and completely insane.

The story starts in 1977 at Happy Day Bible Camp. A vague denominational Christian bible camp in the middle of nowhere USA. The campers and staff are engaged in the sort of things you would expect people in a Christian bible camp to be doing. Mostly sex, drugs, and referencing events that happened in 1977. Like the death of Elvis Presley or commenting about how horrible a certain space opera movie that opened earlier that year. This film is a slasher film, so the nostalgia for the seventies gives way to random bloody murder of everybody except for two people. The added bonus is the killer is dressed up as a nun with a devil mask.

The plot then skips ahead seven years to 1984. Another vague Christian denomination group is test camping at Happy Day Bible Camp to see if it's worth buying. Leading this collection of misfits and dead people walking is one Father Reggie (Reggie Bannister). Sadly this is the point where the script starts to drag because of the who's the killer shell game, crude jokes, and setting up the victims for their slaughter. The jokes are funny and the set up for the third act blood bath is needed but the whole pace of the film just stops.

Eventually the movie crawls to the third act. The murderous nun in the devils mask makes her reappearance and the campers and staff start dropping in amusing fashion. The movie also shifts in tone from tongue in cheek tone to full on camp mockery of the slasher genre. To highlight this, the first person killed is decapitated with great practical effects whereas later the nun kills a girl with a crucifix and penetrating a notorious body cavity. Ron Jeremy makes an amusing and blasphemous cameo.

Overall this is a fun and weird movie. It's a love letter to slasher movies from the seventies and eighties but it is not afraid to make fun of those movies as well. The movie falls down when it come to it's characters and it's pace. The characters are stereotypical cardboard cutouts for comedic purposes most of the time. Like the ditzy girl with nudity in her contract, the dumb fat guy, a few variations on the jock stereotype. Not all the characters are like this but there are enough of them that it does distract from the movie. The pacing issues seem to stem from padding so the movie can get a ninety minute run time.

This is a sold rental and or streaming film for fans of raunchy humor. Also a great film to show at your party for coming out as an atheist.

MVT: Ron Jeremy's cameo. I know it's dickish to not talk about why but it is a spoiler. The spoiler free version is the man can act and is funny, especially in this role.

Make or Break: It's a minor and petty break. But I really would have like Father Reggie to have pulled out a four barreled shot gun.

Score: 5.15 out of 10

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Saturday the 14th (1981)



I really can’t stand the word “panties.”  I get that British folks call underwear “pants,” and I assume this is the feminine variation of that, but it just bugs me.  Some words just sound wrong to me, and I avoid saying them.  The same can be said for certain foreign words that can only be properly pronounced by adopting an accent I don’t have, and I can’t decide if I sound like more of an ass pronouncing it like some haughty continental jerk or just some low grade ugly American.  Back to the point, I think the reason why I don’t care for the aforementioned word is the “-ies” at the end of it.  Maybe it makes it just a little too dainty for me.  Maybe it augments the bilabial and alveolar aspects of its pronunciation beyond my breaking point.  Either way, I usually strain to elude the word’s usage.  Daughter Debbie (Kari Michaelsen, perhaps best known for her work on the Nell Carter sitcom Gimme a Break) spends some of her onscreen time in Howard R Cohen’s Saturday the 14th in her undies, and I must say that these moments and her bathing scene are what have stuck with me all these years since this film came out (hey, I would have been about eight years old).  For better or worse, they’re still a highlight in a film that’s not as godawful as it could be but also isn’t nearly as good, either.

Vampires Waldemar (Jeffrey Tambor; is it possible the creators were making an oblique reference to Paul Naschy’s Waldemar Daninsky character, even though that one’s a werewolf not a vampire?) and Yolanda (Nancy Lee Andrews) get screwed out of the dilapidated house that they simply must buy for some nebulous reason (okay, it’s to lay their hands on the Book of Evil hidden inside), because it has been willed to John (Richard Benjamin) who immediately moves his family into it.  Will there be strange goings on?  You betcha!  Will hilarity ensue?  Well…

The movie starts off with a credit sequence that involves some of the worst animation possibly ever committed to film.  It tells the “story” of a bat (replete with cool shades) who repeatedly flies into a tree outside the house until he dies and gets dragged under the ground by a pair of hands.  Ho.  Ho.  The rest of the film’s humor teeters between not bad (but definitely not gutbusting) jokes and true groan-inducers.  For example, after hearing a scream, John suggests maybe it was an owl.  Wife Mary (Paula Prentiss) lifts the window shade, revealing a fake bat smacking into the glass and confirms that it is, indeed, an owl.  Her delivery makes this pleasantly amusing.  This joke is then driven into the ground by being repeated like a catchphrase, beating this dead horse into glue. John is constantly bewildered by things going on around the house, like who washed the dishes, and he keeps bringing this up as if repeating it will somehow make it funny.  Tambor is his usual dry, tense self, and he and Severn Darden truly make the most of the premise, delivering signature performances that stand out for how much they work (in fairness, Prentiss does a good job with what she’s given, as well).  When asked if he and Yolanda have children, Tambor retorts with, “As often as we can.”  It’s the humor that doesn’t “mug” to the audience that works best.  Son Billy (Kevin Brando, who for some reason reminded me of the kid from Troll 2) is the smartest member of the family.  After being in the dark upon their entrance to the house, the lights mysteriously come on.  John asks where Billy was, and he says he was fixing the fuse box.  The comedy is just hit and miss enough that it never elevates the film, but it never drags it down.

The film is not a parody of a specific horror franchise (as is suggested by the title) or trope.  Instead, it’s a story told with horror elements.  One of the more interesting facets of this narrative is the concept of legends coming to life.  The Book of Evil contains photographs of various creatures (who took them is an enigma never explained), and as each page is turned, the monsters in the pics disappear from the page and appear in reality.  Monsters already exist in this world, but I have to wonder if they all initially sprang from the Book’s pages?  There is some evidence of this being the case later on in the picture.  This connection between the creation of fiction and the creation of reality is intriguing, as it is in films like I, Madman, though it’s not played up here as much as it possibly could have been (then again, the Book is nothing more than a MacGuffin and a means of explaining the appearance of the monsters, so you can’t really blame the filmmakers for not going all deep on this aspect).

One of the other reasons that the film both succeeds and fails, and in fact, one of the reasons why it’s as engaging as it is, is the relationship between violence and humor.  As has been postulated for a long time, the link between Horror and Humor stems from the same primal core of human beings.  Both attempt to elicit extreme physical reactions from an audience (screaming for Horror, laughter for Humor), and both have a way of being very individualized to a specific viewer.  The way that Saturday the 14th mixes the two is odd.  There are scenes that are shot and edited to be particularly horrific, with nary a chuckle in sight.  For example, Mary is attacked by a bunch of bats in the belfry (get it?), and they draw blood, leaving her injured and shocked.  A monster is shot in the head, and it bleeds.  A rather realistic severed head is mistaken for a roast in the refrigerator.  Conversely, there are broad comedy elements that strike like a pie in the face.  A giant, three-fingered rubber glove is discovered in relation to the washing of the dishes.  The family lawyer chokes to death while talking about the curse on the house.  The film is such an oddity in the balancing (or non-balancing, if you like) of its tones, it charms more for its ambitions than for its successes.

MVT:  Darden and Tambor shine when they’re onscreen.  The monster makeups are cheap but appealing, as well.

Make or Break:  The title credits may break some viewers’ will to go on (with the film, at any rate).

Score:  6.5/10       

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

The Milpitas Monster (1976)



The late, great Paul Frees (trust me, you’ve heard his voice before, even if you don’t recognize the name) narrates a short history of the burg of Milpitas, California and its relationship to excessive garbage dumping (“As goes Milpitas – So goes the State”).  After a scene or two of officials and scientists (none of whom will have an impact on the film whatsoever) declaring concern over the smell of all the pollution in the bay area, we are whisked away to the local “sludge lagoon,” where hobo (in the mode of Foster Brooks) George flops around and tries to fish.  Suddenly, the titanic, titular terror appears from the water to wreak semi-havoc and steal people’s garbage cans, and we’re kind of off to the races.

There is a gang of punk kids in Robert L. Burrill’s The Milpitas Monster, and they are something special to behold.  These aren’t punks in the sense of mohawks and torn clothes.  These are punks in the sense of juvenile delinquents with too much time on their hands and likely overindulgent parents, and despite that, they are utter failures at their calling.  They delight in taunting our non-hero Jeff by calling him “Penguin” For no apparent reason.  They drive to their high school on their day off for kicks and then complain that there’s nothing going on there.  They decide they are going to “stink up the whole town” by painting giant footprints all over the place in imitation of the actual ones that are turning up all over the place (I don’t think they ever get around to actually doing this; they’re all lip).  They sneak George into the big school dance in a garbage can, spike the punch, and then just kind of hang out.  They receive more screen time than almost any other character, but they add nothing to the film other than giving us scenes of brats being bratty.  They create no tension, they suffer no comeuppance, and they advance the story not one whit.  Nevertheless, in a film about a giant monster, they are still the most interesting thing in it, and they are not that interesting at all.

Way, way back in time, monster kids formed a small cult of special effects enthusiasts and amateur filmmakers, some of whom would go on to professional careers and acclaim (the most notable I can think of being David Allen, Dennis Muren, and Jim Danforth who all worked on the visual effects for the equally low budget but exponentially more entertaining Equinox).  Magazines like Cinemagic (created by another effects nut, Don Dohler of Nightbeast fame) gave detailed descriptions of how to create special effects on very little bread.  It celebrated creativity and problem-solving (something which has become a lost art, in my opinion), and it came from a grass roots perspective that paid homage to effects pioneers like Georges Melies, even if it didn’t realize or acknowledge outwardly it was doing so.  

The magazine also gave a forum for young filmmakers to advertise and share their work with other like-minded people.  Here’s a random example from issue twenty (volume four, number two): “Company for the Night.  A quiet tale of a corpse who after a hundred years, yearns for the warmth and companionship of the living.  He leaves the grave and joins an elderly couple for the night.  Producer: ONO Productions, Ltd.  Director/Writer/Camera: John Dixon.  FX include: stop-motion, animation, miniature cemetery set and house set.  Regular-8.  Running time: 20 – 30 minutes.”  Now, not all of the stories were this seemingly mature.  In fact, a great many were simply riffs on popular horror/science fiction properties of the time, barebones skeletons existing only to hang some special effects meat on (which can be a perfectly acceptable approach, mind you).  Burrill and company are certainly in this latter category (and for the record, I have never seen Company for the Night, so I cannot comment on its actual quality or even if it ever reached completion).  He and his friends were high school students at the time of this film’s production, and they put this whole thing together for around eleven thousand dollars.  What I found amazing watching the film is how they wrung every last ounce of production value out of that budget.  There are aerial shots (granted, pretty shaky, but still) and a number of cameos from the likes of television horror host Bob Wilkins as well as the aforementioned Frees (both of whom I can only assume did this as a favor, unless they decided they wanted to work dirt cheap for a few hours).  There is the sense that everyone involved wanted to contribute and make this film work in the tradition of “let’s put on a show” storylines the world over.  It’s this spirit of community that imbues The Milpitas Monster with what charms it has.

The enviro-horror angle of the story is underplayed (and it should be stated that this film is intended more as a comedy than anything else, but even comedies can have themes and usually contain at least a few humorous moments) focusing only on the wicked bad smell of all the garbage around town.  It doesn’t delve even slightly into the actual impact of over-dumping, the actual contamination of ground and water, or anything of the sort (outside of the giant monster, but since it consumes garbage, it could be argued that it’s actually a solution to the issue; not the best solution obviously, but a solution nonetheless).  Every character comments about the stink of things (scientists complain about a fish’s odor, officials complain about water odor, Jeff complains about girlfriend Priscilla’s perfume odor) but not about the health risks involved.  

With all this in mind, then, let’s talk about the film’s effects, since they are its sole raison d’etre.  The first effect we see is the monster’s stop motion hand clenching its way toward the surface of the sludge lagoon.  This is quickly followed by a full-sized prop of the beast’s hand emerging from the water, quickly followed by some more stop motion work of the creature taking its first flight.  Even for a god like Ray Harryhausen, the process is both labor and time intensive, and for the resources they had, I’d say the filmmakers here did a competent, if not stunning, job in this respect.  The prop claw works well, primarily because it’s only shown in quick shots, but it’s still good enough to stand up to others of its ilk.  There are some forced perspective shots that effectively place the monster in real environments.  The one area where the effects work really stands out, though, is in its miniatures, particularly a scene involving the monster’s destruction of a local restaurant.  The scale is accurate, there is enough detail to pull off the illusion when compared to the actual building (come to think of it, I don’t recall offhand if the actual building is shown, so kudos for making it seem so), and most importantly, the lighting is correct.  It looks like a building lit by a street lamp, and it sells the image, even with a giant monster crouching next to it.  However, the monster suit itself is simply tragic.  Its head is a glorified gas mask (yeah, we get it, garbage stinks) with bug eyes.  Its body is formless and undetailed, like you might find on a high school mascot costume.  Worse than these are its wings, which are limp, shiny adornments that would make even The Bugaloos (look it up) laugh in derision.  For how much it does right in the visual effects department, it’s a crushing blow that the eponymous character just doesn’t work at all.  Combine this with the stilted editing, the awkward acting, and the lack of any cohesive storyline or compelling characters, and you have a film that’s more curio than captivating.

MVT:  For its myriad flaws, you truly have to admire the level of enthusiasm that gave birth to The Milpitas Monster.

Make or Break:  Once you realize that you’re going to be spending an inordinate amount of time with the pointless antics of George and the J.D. gang with absolutely nothing of consequence happening, you may want to tap out on this one.

Score:  3/10