Sunday, March 8, 2015

Episode #327: Welcome Home Monty

Welcome back for another episode of the show that give you the most for your free download!!!

This week Large William is joined by CDR from the Cult of Muscle podcast for coverage of Welcome Home, Soldier Boys (1971) directed by Richard Compton and Flexing with Monty (2010) directed by John Albo!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_327.mp3 
 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!



Episode #326: Top 30 First Time Watches of 2014

Welcome to our Top 30 first time watches for the year 2014!!!

Join Will, Todd and Kelly as they discuss the films they saw for the first time in 2014 and where they stand in order for viewing pleasure!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_326.mp3 
 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!


Episode #325: Bone Cop

Welcome back to the GGtMC!!!

This week the Gents cover TimeCop (1994) directed by Peter Hyams and starring Jean Claude Van Damme and Bone (1972) directed by Larry Cohen and starring Yaphet Kotto!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_325.mp3 
 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!



Episode #324: Death Steps of Vengeance

Welcome back for another episode of the GGtMC!!!

This week Sammy and Will return to Italy for a little gialli...and a little spaghetti. We cover Death Steps in the Dark (1977) starring Leonard Mann and Vengeance (1968) starring Richard Harrison!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_324.mp3 
Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!



Friday, March 6, 2015

The King of Marvin Gardens (1972)



During the 2014-2015 NFL season, the Green Bay Packers defeated the New England Patriots by a score of 26-21 at Lambeau Field. Prior to the game, Large William and I agreed upon an interesting wrinkle: if my Patriots won, he’d be required to watch and review a movie of my choosing for the Midnite Ride (e.g. Jamaa Fanaka’s STREET WARS), whereas if the Packers won, I’d cover 1972’s THE KING OF MARVIN GARDENS for the GGtMC blog. This particular gentlemen’s bet was a win-win proposition. It’s long overdue, but here’s my end of the deal.

The antiquated architecture standing in the Atlantic City occupied by this film’s characters was long gone when I walked off the boardwalk and onto the frigid sand nearly 40 years later to spread a departed family member’s ashes. Despite this difference in mise en scène, I can tell you with certainty that Atlantic City in the winter months is every bit as bleak and biting as it is in Bob Rafelson’s 1972 film, THE KING OF MARVIN GARDENS. While the characters find that it’s a terrible time and place to hatch a real-estate scheme or get hired as an auctioneer, it proves more than adequate for bonfires and horsey rides.

During a broadcast into the wee hours, talk-radio personality David Staebler (Jack Nicholson) is urgently summoned to Atlantic City by his older brother, Jason (Bruce Dern). Without any further context, David leaves Philadelphia and arrives at the train station, only to be collected by his brother’s cheeky companion, Sally (Ellen Burstyn) and a clumsy welcoming band of drums and brass players. Trombone Shorty, they ain’t.


When the brothers first reunite, they do so with jail bars between them; jailed for reasons unknown, Jason is optimistic he’ll get out by sundown if David can track down a guy named Lewis. That doesn’t quite materialize, but Jason is cruising around the boardwalk on a motorized caddy in what seems like only hours later. He reveals a plan to secure real estate for a gambling enterprise on an obscure South Pacific island, and he wants David as a partner. Along for the venture as something of a support team are Sally and Jessica (Julia Anne Robinson), a pretty young thing as naive as she is fun-loving. Both women occupy points in an uneasy love triangle with Jason.

As the plan develops, it unravels at nearly the same rate. Certain events reveal Jason’s pattern (neurosis?) of overselling. (Case in point: Jason may not be able to afford the room in a historic hotel he’d convinced Sally he owned). David can barely contain his unease about the scheme and it seems that simply being near his brother puts him on edge. Sally is losing both confidence and trust in Jason, and shifts an envious eye towards Jessica. Failure doesn’t adequately describe the worst possible outcome for this motley crew.


Despite their shared genetics, the differences between the Staebler brothers couldn't be more stark. David is an introverted storyteller leading a dull life in a Philadelphia apartment he shares with their grandfather. Jason is a charismatic con artist and feverish dreamweaver with lofty aspirations. At a dinner following his release from jail, Jason sucks down brightly colored cocktails while rapping about stolen cars full of Swiss watches as David nurses a glass of milk. Rafelson leaves no stone unturned -- be it visual, narrative, or in characterization -- in illustrating this contrast, yet his efforts never feel try-hard, nor do moments feel unearned. 

Lensed by legendary cinematographer Laszlo Kovacs, the film has a bounty of well-composed scenes with tight framing and offbeat arrangements. One of my favorites features Dern and Nicholson facing each other on horseback on the beach, with the animals barely stirring. Why? No idea. Many of the exterior shots on and around the boardwalk have an overcast, dreary look that reflect a decaying environment, but there are timely and purposeful tweaks to the palette -- a daytime bonfire scene which acts as a liberating cleanse for one character might be the brightest among them.


The film is book-ended by a pair of David’s on-air monologues which border on confessionals. I won’t spoil the content or moods of either, but the first one trails off with David describing he and his brother as “accomplices” before a phone call to his booth engineer abruptly interrupts the conclusion -- the same call that prompts his trip to Atlantic City. Towards the end of the film, David delivers an equally engrossing monologue that transitions into a scene where the brothers’ grandfather projects an 8mm home movie on the apartment’s wall showing the two young boys building a sand castle at the beach -- in other words, a temporary structure assumed to be knocked down or washed away. In lesser hands, this closing visual may have come off as clumsy or sickly sweet, but I found it dovetailed nicely with the film’s themes of lofty ambitions and a fleeting (but persistent) want for paradise.


MVT: This is a character-driven film and as such, how you evaluate it depends a lot on how convinced you are by the on-screen relationships. Both Dern and Nicholson put forth measured performances of two complex characters existing in a state of vascillating stress due to their  oppositional quirks. Burstyn is amazing as Jason’s aging, slighted lover. The charismatic performances are great and the chemistry is even better, but the underlying dynamic between the brothers is the most valuable thing in the film. I have a younger brother myself, and I found this element relatable. Fortunately, it's much more dysfuntional than how he and I relate to each other.

Make or Break: There are plenty of scenes featuring crackling dialogue. There are other moments that reveal nuanced and meaningful characterizations and the dynamics among the players (both individual relationships and as a group). There’s dazzling imagery throughout. The scene in the abandoned convention hall where our foursome puts on a mock Miss America paegent combines all of these elements and was a big make for me. David stiffly narrates as the paegent host, Jason screams encouragement from atop a stack of cargo boxes, Jessica plays the wide-eyed starlet, and Sally is off to the side playing the world’s largest pipe organ (allegedly).

Score: 7.75 / 10

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Death Run (1988)


My friends and I once attempted to develop a feature length film.  I should probably back up a bit.  This was back when we were in elementary school (I’m thinking seventh or eighth grade), and films featuring ninja were widespread.  Having recently experienced the warped insanity of Kosei Saito’s The Ninja Wars (most likely rented from the local Hollywood Video), we were inspired.  The other big thing that was going on in the world of cinema (at least as far as twelve-year-old boys were concerned) was the avalanche of low-rent Action films from the stables of such studios as Cannon Films.  Consequently, our film couldn’t just have plain, old ninja.  They had to be ninja who also used machine guns and pistols.  At any rate, a “script” was written (most likely by hand in composition book), and it was as juvenile and threadbare as you’re imagining.  

As you might suspect, problems quickly arose.  For starters, we couldn’t decide on who was going to play the lead (who also got to kiss the heroine).  None of us knew the first thing about martial arts outside of what we’d seen on screen (and we sure as shit couldn’t duplicate even that much).  None of us had a ninja uniform (and none of us could afford one from the ads in such magazines as…well…Ninja).  Probably most damning of all was the fact that none of us had a camera with which to film our magnum opus (although I would argue that the dearth of ninja outfits was a very close second).  Once a few weeks or months of trying to outthink reality had passed, we conceded that our totally awesome ninja movie would never take shape.  But the world is not poorer for this lack.  We still have plenty of films made in kids’ backyards (go check out some back issues of Cinemagic, if you doubt me), and if even something like Michael J. Murphy’s Death Run can see some form of release, there simply has to be hope for every starry-eyed child filmmaker out there.

Paul (Rob Bartlett) and his girlfriend Jenny (Wendy Parsons) are put into suspended animation by Paul’s doctor mother (Kay Lowrey), as a nuclear holocaust tears civilization apart outside their bunker.  Waking up twenty-five years in the future for no discernible reason other than to start the film, they discover that the world is full of mutants on one side and post-apocalyptic punks on the other.  The latter are centralized in Junk City and ruled over by the villainous-just-by-looking-at-him Messiah (Patrick Olliver), a claw-handed sadist who splits the lovers apart and forces Paul to run the eponymous “obstacle course.”

The reason why I mention this film in the same breath as my and my friends’ abortive cinematic attempt is because I like to think that, had we been successful, the end result would likely have been similar in quality to Death Run.  It’s clear from the very first frames here that the film was made for a budget upon which even a shoestring would feel pity.  Most interior shots appear to be lit with a single light source (possibly a flashlight).  Cuts rarely match.  The majority of the actors look like they used their own clothes for their wardrobe (the one exception being Messiah, but you never know).   The whole film is post-dubbed (whether because it was filmed on a non-sync system or they couldn’t afford sound equipment or they could and the soundtrack turned out like crap, I couldn’t say), and the voices rarely match the actors’ lips.  The actors also seem to be very careful about not only not making contact with their fellow thespians in the action scenes but also about not giving the impression that they could have for the camera’s sake.  I’m unfamiliar with the heavy metal bands and/or songs used copiously on the soundtrack, but I wouldn’t be in the least bit surprised if one or more of them listed some of the film’s actors as members.  The mutant makeups are largely slapped on bits of colored latex with bladders threatening to make them pop off the actors’ skin.  

But despite the movie being strictly amateur hour, it manages to be astonishingly well-paced, partly because it’s only a little over an hour long and partly because it wastes absolutely none of its time on extraneous things like exposition, characterization, et cetera.  The filmmakers jump in with both feet, hit the ground running, and simply don’t let up.  It’s also clear that the people behind this were forthright about their work.  How else do you explain the extraordinarily homoerotic, extraordinarily straight-faced training montage (including shirtless one-armed pushups, shirtless grappling, and shirtless military presses done with a log)?  And yet, they’re also clearly having fun, because why else carry something like this all the way to distribution unless you are?  Plus, it’s evident that there are no boundaries in what can and will happen to the characters, so there is an element of tension just to see which of the cardboard cutouts makes it to the final credits (you might be surprised).  This, combined with the film taking the time to hit every single Action/Post-Apocalyptic genre cliché ever invented (okay, that’s maybe an exaggeration, since they clearly didn’t have the money for the bigger effects, but the point remains the same), gives just enough of a mix between the familiar and the unexpected to make the viewer not want to scream throughout the experience. 

The most interesting aspect of the film is the Adam and Eve element that’s supposed to be embodied (in conception if not necessarily execution) by Paul and Jenny.  They are literally reborn into a new world of which they have no knowledge.  They are supposed to be the saviors of the human race or the progenitors of a new, “clean” (read: non-irradiated) race (the only conceivable reason to put your scion into cryogenic suspension during a nuclear war; it’s not as if the world is going to become more hospitable down the road from there).  The young couple transform from beings of innocence (which is not strictly true, since they went to sleep as young adults) into beings formed (one could say corrupted) by the world in which they find themselves.  The knowledge gained is beneficial for survival but not necessarily “good” since it brings with it much suffering.  Thankfully, the film does its best to ease the pain (for the audience, at any rate), so no harm, no foul.

MVT:  The earnest attitude of the filmmakers is reflected in every frame of the film, and, I have to say, it is infectious.

Make or Break:  I can’t give out details, but the Make is the scene where our group meets up with a gang of rebels.   It’s actually shocking for what’s revealed in the action as well as how this affects our protagonists.             
       
Score:  6.25/10

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Dungeons & Dragons: The Book of Vile Darkness (2012)






Directed by: Gerry Lively
Runtime: 82 minutes

As of this post this is the last Dungeons and Dragons movie. It is also the best and worst of the three Dungeons and Dragons movies. It is the best as because it is the most faithful to the original source material and it is the worst because it assumes that the audience is made up of hard core D&D fans. This movie also assumes that the audience has read The Book of Vile Darkness.

Yes I should explain this one. The Book of Vile Darkness is one of two adult supplemental material books for D&D. Basically additional information for people who would rather pay for stuff they don't want to make up themselves. As for the subject matter of the book, take the works of Stephen King, Clive Barker, Poppy Z Brite, and Dan Simmons, run their collected works through a blender and have R.L. Stein filter and write the result. An afternoon spent watching horror movie or reading horror novels would be much better than what The Book Vile Darkness is.

Like the second movie there is back story over the opening credits. It is about Lord Dickhead, a man who hates all things living and gets off on being an evil dick to everything. Near the end of his life he clues into the fact that the fun will end when he dies. So he makes a deal with demons that his soul can't be destroyed and then has himself turned into a book. A book so evil that it spread evil, corruption, and madness to anyone who comes in contact with this vile book.

All this evil stupidity creates the Bros of Pelor (Pelor is the god of light and keg parties). These Bros are so awesome that Pelor gives them medallions to help them spread righteous light across the land. The forces of evil deiced to break the book into three parts. The ink was found and destroyed but the cover and pages disappeared.

The movie opens with our young hero becoming a Bro. And like all young heroes he thinks he is the chosen one who is going to change everything. But when he taps the scared stone, the stone does not light up proving that he is the chosen one. So our hero runs off while his fellow Bros have a good laugh at the hero's naivety.

The hero's dad consoles the hero after he is sure that he will not kill himself laughing at the site of his son. The two of them talk about how foolish the hero is being. Meanwhile, barbarians attack the Bros keg party because barbarians are dicks when they smell beer. So father and son join their fellow Bros and the scene cuts to next day. Because who really wants to watch a battle in a fantasy movie.

Our hero wakes up from being hit in the head and finds he is the only Bro left alive. He has a hazy idea that the barbarians kidnapped his dad. So trusting to plot convenience our hero sets out to save his dad. After some needless misadventures with a sex worker our hero finds the people who ordered the barbarians to attack the Bros in the first place. We have goth witch, creep with a mask, annoying assassin, hired goon, and Mr. I have two minutes to live.

This group won't let our hero join until he kills someone in cold blood. Luckily for him, Mr. I have two minutes to live remembers his name and walks right into our hero's sword. So team evil sets out to do the next thing on their list of tasks, kill a bad looking computer generated dragon. This leads to travel and getting more reasons to hate the characters. Then they fight and kill the dragon. This leads to the major thing that takes me out of the movie, everyone except our hero is needlessly evil and stupid. In the dragon's cave team evil finds the mcguffin they need and villagers from a town they need to visit. So what does team evil want to do with the villagers? Why kill them because they are weak for letting a dragon capture them.

However our hero is quick thinking and save the villagers by pointing out by keeping them alive the village will welcome team evil with open arms. So team evil goes into the village, welcomed like heroes, and hired goon goes to the village brothel to meet the topless female nudity requirement. Our hero and goth witch fulfill the required love interest part of the film and creep with a mask goes around the village being a needlessly evil dick because he can. Oh and the annoying assassin is robbing the village.

The next day team evil is about to leave but the villagers are not happy about being robbed. So the villagers locked the gates of the outside and have rounded up a posse to kill team evil. Our hero nearly talks team evil out of a needless fight but creep with a mask makes it worse. Forcing team evil to kill all the villagers without the villagers putting up much of a fight.

Later that night hired goon gets character development and poisoned by our hero. Then our hero puts hired goon and all the treasure team evil has collected into a magical bag (bag of holding) and throws the bag into a near by lake. He then puts annoying assassin in a situation where the assassin gets himself killed. This paves the way for team evil to get the last mcguffin and the last act of this movie.


If you are a D&D fan this movie is for you. It is the closest thing to a movie version of  role playing session that is not a comedy that you are likely to find. As for everyone else if you can't find anything else or you can't sleep this movie might be for you. But I don't suggest looking this one up unless this really your thing or your are a masochistic fantasy fan.

MVT: There is a undead child that benefits from the low quality computer animation as it adds to the creepiness.

Make or Break: What breaks this movie for me is team evil being evil and stupid so the hero looks more heroic.

Score: 4.15 out of 10





Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Men From The Gutter (1983)



Pre-digital Hong Kong genre cinema holds a great fascination for me, not so much for the technical achievements, the jaw-dropping stuntwork, or the bonkers ideas they throw around, but for the ambience of their visuals.  They can look beautifully garish as in many of the set bound Shaw Bros martial arts films or dirt-lickingly grotty as in some of the sleazier Category III films.  They even manage to mix the two from time to time.  The way Hong Kong is often portrayed is as alternately glamorous as it is dangerous.  Decked out nightclubs with gorgeous women and men in white suits are a staple.  Conversely, blown out ratholes where people in jeans and cheap tee shirts are forced to live provide the flip side.  

It’s not so much that this dichotomy exists, it’s that these films give the impression that these two strata of society exist essentially on top of one another.  There is the distinct sense that if a character opened the wrong door in a discotheque, they’d be met with a sweaty, stabby, rapey nightmare to set the old spine a-tingling.  It’s as if everyone is trapped within the city, like a real-life Escape from New York, and some denizens have merely managed to crawl to the top and accumulate wealth which only further buffers them from the dregs beneath them (or so they hope).  

Now, I’m no expert on Hong Kong films, and I’ll admit I haven’t seen nearly as many as others have, but the one thing which partly defines a lot of them from my perspective (particularly in the Crime arena) is this idea of the callous villainy of the wealthy versus the desperate ambition of the poor.  This is reinforced for me through the texture of the visuals.  The more realistic Hong Kong films have a certain grainy, desaturated look, and the worlds created are often filled with box-strewn warehouses, cluttered streets, and clogged up piers.  I can’t say how close to reality any of this is (and that’s really not the point anyway), but from films like Lam Nai-Choi’s Men from the Gutter (aka An Qu), I would suggest that my theories only gather more support. 

In his lousy tenement apartment, Wang (Parkman Wong Pak-Man) climbs out of bed in the middle of the night, crushes the cockroaches scuttling on his lunch, and ventures out to meet his ex-con pals Long (Lung Tin-Sang) and Brainless (Billy Lau Nam-Kwong) to discuss their big plan to get rich.  But the police are onto Wang, and an officer is killed while trying to apprehend him, sending Sgt. Zhao (Venom Clan alumnus Lo Meng) into a frenzy.  Meanwhile, fellow policeman Qiu (Michael Miu Kiu-Wai) is investigating the murder of Zeng Cai (Lee Hoi-Sang), bodyguard of criminal kingpin Xu Wen (Wong Yung), by Zi Jian (Jason Pai Piao) and their ties to each other.  Complicated stuff.

Perhaps the oddest thing about Men from the Gutter is that it is, on its surface, two separate crime stories the only linkage between which is the police officers.  Nonetheless, I would offer up that Lam and company are treating the Crime genre in a metaphorical way (while still delivering a cracking good Action film) and attempting to look at more than one side of the lower echelons of society in relation to crime.  Zi Jian’s motivations are revenge and honor.  He has no real avaricious goals in mind.  Wang’s motivation is one hundred percent monetary.  He gets very upset every time he thinks about all that  he doesn’t have.  He believes that money will solve all his problems.  As the title suggests, then, Zi Jian is coming out of the gutter to get at Xu Wen, to drag him back down into the gutter.  Wang is in the gutter struggling to get out by any means necessary.  Zhao and Qiu are the forces of order, standing in the gutter up to their waists, trying to maintain control while not going under.  In the gutter, a person has to do what’s necessary, but there is always the element of choice, and the end goal (personified by a freighter and its captain) is not guaranteed.  From this viewpoint, the film begins to take focus as more than the sum of its parts, even though it may not appear obvious at first glance.

The film is also loaded with images of characters watching and being watched, predominantly in the narrative of Zi Jian and Xu Wen.  Photos are taken of Xu Wen at a restaurant with Zi Jian in the background.  After being questioned by Qiu, Xu Wen looks at himself in a mirror while crime scene photographers snap pictures.  Zi Jian is shown making love to a prostitute in the reflection from his eyeglass lenses.  Later, he takes a slingshot and a metal ball and shoots the image of himself in his hotel mirror.  He checks his teeth in reflections in a store front window as well as in a fitness club mirror.  Point of view shots play into this as well.  At the gym, Zi Jian sneaks up on an unsuspecting guy (in POV) and knocks him out for his clothes.  Later, there is a POV shot following Zi Jian (and in which he again checks himself out in a mirror).  If these are just stylistic affectations or character quirks, they are lingered on longer and are more numerous than one might expect.  I tend to think that the reflections are how the characters remove themselves from their world.  By engaging with a mirror, staring into oneself, they are disengaging from reality and fortifying themselves for what lies ahead.  Similarly, POV shots like those herein tend to disengage the viewer from the film’s reality (we don’t share what’s in the minds of the characters through whose eyes we see), targeting where they’re headed rather than what surrounds them in the moment.  The characters are watchers and watched, within and without themselves, and a similar affinity is reached with the film’s viewer through these visual choices of the filmmakers.   

Men from the Gutter is surprisingly non-exploitative, as well.  Aside from one shot and a scene with some bare breasts, there’s no sex (consensual or non-consensual).  There is a decent amount of violence and blood, but not nearly to the levels of gore showcased in some of the Shaw Bros both at this point in time and in the past.  Outside of the film’s outstandingly heightened climactic sequence, the film is rooted firmly in reality.  That said, the final set piece does contain acrobatics and nigh-superheroic levels of stamina.  It also has a huge (and I mean that both literally and figuratively) concluding moment that will truly make your jaw drop.  But the film never goes off the rails, and it does a very admirable job of balancing its elements.  If you’re an Action film fan, and you haven’t seen this film, you need to (it’s available with subtitles on Youtube).

MVT:  I love the character of Zi Jian, especially as brought to life by Jason Pai Piao.  He’s odd and colorful, clearly dangerous, but also with a noble air about him.

Make or Break:  The heist scene is marvelously orchestrated.  It’s complex, gritty, and clearly blocked and edited.  I think that, in some ways at least, it encompasses all of the emotional heart of the film as well as the thematic points.

Score:  7/10