It’s been said, often and (I
believe) correctly, that an Action film’s most important feature is its
villain’s plot. Belloq and the Nazis in Raiders of the Lost Ark want to use the
titular artifact to defeat the Allies (and by extension, rule the world). Megalon and Gigan want to conquer the world
in the name of Seatopia in Godzilla
Versus Megalon. The Duke of New York
wants to use the President of the United States in order to break himself and
his followers out of Manhattan in Escape
from New York (whether he wants to rule the world of not is debatable). The more devious, intricate, and large-scale
the scheme, the more heightened the stakes and the more defined the conflict between
protagonist and antagonist. Just look at
almost any of the James Bond films for further evidence. This is one reason why I enjoyed the recent Avengers: Age of Ultron, though the film
has problems aplenty. James Spader’s portrayal of the robot
is spot on, menacing enough for a superhero film with enough of the actor’s
affectations to make this viewer crave more screen time with his cinematic
avatar, and his plan is something straight out of a comic book.
Whether or not a villain is
colorful or believes that what he/she is doing is right, how they go about
doing it is a bit more important, in my opinion. This is part of the reason why the Batman television series, which aired
from 1966 to 1968, is so beloved. It was
completely removed from reality, focusing on and augmenting the camp aspects of
its comic book origins (themselves at an apex of nuttiness at that time;
witness the frequency of primate-centric stories at DC Comics, if you doubt me).
Further, the plots were usually just
batshit (pun intended) insane. Where
else could you see a giant clam trying to eat a couple of guys in tight,
brightly colored spandex (nothing Freudian there, I’m sure)? And the histrionics of the villains were on a
level of theatricality and farce so high, its nosebleeds got nosebleeds
(especially as contrasted against the controlled, über-stoicism of the Dynamic
Duo). But people remember and love it to
this day. Naturally, then, imitators
sprang out of the woodwork to cash in on this popularity, and Rene Cardona’s Batwoman (aka La Mujer
Murcielago) is a prime example of a film’s reach exceeding its grasp in
this regard.
The authorities are stymied by a
string of murders worldwide, the most recent of which is wrestler El Rayo whose
body is dragged out of the sea in Acapulco.
At the behest of Captain Mario Robles (Hector Godoy), the Batwoman (Maura
Monti) is called in to assist by going undercover (but still in costume) at
a local gym where many wrestlers train.
It’s soon discovered that the flagitious Dr. Eric Williams (Roberto Cañedo) is killing these men
and extracting their pineal glands in order to create an army of Fish-Men! Our intrepid heroes set about to foil
Williams’ diabolical plan. But first, some
cocktails at the outdoor lounge.
One of the things this film does
is illustrates the specific differences between movies produced in Hollywood
and movies produced in other countries to cash in on them. In Hollywood, this type of film is driven by
its narrative, with each scene typically building on each previous scene until
it reaches its climax. In Batwoman, each scene is almost
self-contained, and whether or not they actually relate to the film’s plot is
almost an afterthought. Thus, any scenes
featuring interaction between the protagonists and the antagonists is as
equally weighted as any other scene, importance notwithstanding. This narrative isn’t built on escalating
action but rather a constant, set level of involvement. There is also a casual aspect to the scenes
between action scenes, evidenced by the amount of time the main characters are
shown nonchalantly discussing how fruitless their investigation is while
slurping down drinks at a bar, or in some character’s den, or at a beach party
where you almost think you can spot Eric Von Zipper in the background. Some would call this lazy writing, and they
would be right. However, this easygoing
attitude is part of the movie’s charm.
The travelogue-esque footage, the non-propulsive approach to the story,
the informal exposition/happy hour scenes, the insertion of some luchadora
wrestling, it all adds up to a relaxed perspective on itself, a flurry of
fantasies for the viewer to behold, though they know they will likely never
partake (sort of like the “White Telephone” films of the 1930s [white
telephones being something most poor people could nary afford at the time],
which were depictions of idealized societies and wish fulfillment for the lower
classes).
In the same way of the television
phenomenon on which this film is patterned, there is a meta/self-reflexive edge
to the filmmaking in Batwoman. Many transitions are done via whip pan, a
cheaper version of the swirling blur underneath the Bat symbol’s approach and
retreat from the American Batman series. Williams’ assistant (Jorge Mandragón), named Igor of course, places a gas mask over the
camera lens, even though the person he is actually anesthetizing is about a
foot and a half to his right. Divers
swim directly at the camera, menacing our heroine. POV shots from Batwoman’s perspective show
her swimming toward Williams’ boat (The Reptilicus, in case you were
wondering). When Batwoman peeks through
a keyhole, we’re shown what she sees through a keyhole-shaped matte (an effect reportedly
going all the way back to 1902’s What
Happened to the Inquisitive Janitor).
This self-awareness of itself and of its production highlights an
emphasis on performance in the film and particularly how its female heroine
sees and is seen. We’re meant to be in
on it with the filmmakers, erasing any inclination we may have to treat the
goings on seriously (difficult enough to do with a film titled Batwoman). All of this is set to the hep, lounge
stylings of Leo Acosta and his jazz
combo, a surefire way to cement a film’s nonchalant coolness. Like the Luchador movies featuring
personalities like El Santo and Demonio Azul, it must be taken for
granted that this is simply the world inhabited by these characters, and it is
a world that disregards the whole for its parts. After all, if you can’t put off the end of
the world for a little rum and coke action every now and then, what’s the
point?
MVT: I’m just going to
embrace my inner pig and give it to Maura
Monti and her Batwoman character (maybe more her costumes, since her
character is wafer thin). She draws the
eye to her no matter what she’s wearing (including some rather unflattering
sweats and some very flattering swimwear), and the filmmakers knew enough to
allow the camera to leer at her body at every available opportunity. Which is a lot.
Make or Break: The
introduction to Batwoman is the Make.
It’s a nice, little montage showing off Monti being glamorous (and in direct address to the camera at some
points), practicing her shooting skills (even though this never comes up again
in the film, although it does give us Monti
togged out like a cowgirl in a black leather vest), and even showing off her
wrestling chops (I’m fairly confident that was a stunt double). It’s pretty much everything you can expect
from this movie in about a minute.
Score: 6.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment