I don’t know that I believe in
psychics. Brushing aside any of the
science (or pseudoscience) about the human brain and how much of it is actually
“tapped into” or not in that regard or whether that’s all just bullshit fueled
by fantastic fiction (surely not), I’m just unsure on a core, cynical level that
there are folks who can access some nebulous spirit world or glimpse into the
future simply with the power of their mind.
But like Fox Mulder, I want to believe, and this is one of the many
struggles that goes on daily between my rational and irrational mind. I want to believe in things like this,
because I want to believe that the world isn’t as drably mundane as it actually
is. By that same token, I’ve never
personally encountered any convincing evidence to prove the converse (to be
fair, it takes a lot to convince me).
Maybe it goes back to my love of
Godzilla films and Eiji Tsuburaya’s
philosophy of having a sense of wonder about the world and wanting to pass this
on to others through his work. I mean,
if things like psychics or Bigfoot or UFOs don’t exist, all that leaves is a
workaday existence filled with the crushing realities of life (I know, I’m
starting to get depressing here).
Contrarily, these things really probably shouldn’t be proven one way or
the other, because then they would become as unremarkable as everything else we
face daily. In some ways, this is the
same function that film bestows. Cinema
provides us with lives less ordinary, and we live in these narratives for a
time, staving off the real world and all its problems, even as it reflects
and/or addresses them. My reasoning on all
of this may read as murky to you, but that’s only because it’s murky to me (I’m
notoriously bad at being black or white on a lot of things; the curse of a semi-open
mind). So I’m okay (and we, as an
audience, are okay) with investing in the possibility that Virginia Ducci (Jennifer O’Neill) can see a murder she
wasn’t actually present for in Lucio
Fulci’s Seven Notes in Black (aka
The Psychic aka Sette Note in Nero aka Death
Tolls Seven Times). I mean, why
watch a film about a psychic, otherwise?
When she was just a young girl,
Virginia “saw” her mother’s death while she was miles and miles away. Now an
adult, Virginia, housewife of the wealthy Francesco Ducci (Gianni Garko), suddenly begins to have visions again, this time of
a murder. Obsessed with and plagued by
her second sight, she pushes on in her investigation, placing herself in mortal
peril.
Time in this film is fragmented
in much the same way that reality is fragmented in other Fulci films (in fact, I would argue they essentially are the same). We are constantly taken from the linear
present to the murder, which is never presented in a straight line. We get a shot of a smashed mirror, a shot of a
yellow (giallo) cigarette in a blue ashtray, a shot of a man’s feet dragging
across a carpet, etcetera. This
continuously happens to Virginia throughout the film, and it is usually
accompanied by a quick zoom into her eyes (a form of Fulci’s signature ocular trauma motif?). In other words, the camera attacks her, and
the result is a disorientating reordering of the real world. In this sense, Virginia is brought into Hell
(or a hell), similar to that which
bursts forth through the portal under the hotel in The Beyond and so forth, the difference here being that a person is
the gateway rather than a place, and she is drawn through her mind to this Hell
rather than this Hell being drawn through a door to us. Another contrast is that Virginia’s reality is
a knot ceaselessly being untangled, whereas in The Beyond, reality is being twisted, though both stories will
eventually still make some sort of sense in their own way (one is just more
literal than the other, arguably).
Also fitting with Fulci’s other work, Seven Notes in Black is a fatalistic
film (as films about psychics tend to be).
Virginia has witnessed something, and she must follow the line of it to
the bitter end. There’s no getting
around it, because this is the only way for her to unburden herself of her
visions (at least for now). Plus, there
is the aspect that what’s coming down the pike is inexorable, despite attempts
to avoid it. The segments have to be
pieced together in the proper sequence for order to be reinstated (whether or
not this reinstated order is better or worse than what came before it is debatable). Yet, as the pieces fall into place, Virginia
understands (as do we) that she is following a preordained narrative; she just
didn’t realize it at first. Her free
will, then, is robbed from her, for the most part. The only question left open is whether or not
she will survive (you can argue that her free will kicks in here, but previous
evidence makes that claim suspect), and this provides the tension of the
film. Just because you can see into
another time or across continents, doesn’t mean you can halt the universe’s
forward movement. There is still cause
and effect, but Virginia’s agency is limited in its influence on them.
From what I’ve seen of Fulci’s filmography, I feel fairly
confident stating that Seven Notes in
Black is not only his most coherent film, but it’s also his most
accomplished (I’m sure some would contend that Lizard in a Woman’s Skin is the winner in the latter
category). The film stays on point from
start to finish. It builds its story
from disparate elements, and said story remains unambiguous despite the
ambiguity upon which it’s constructed.
There is also a lack of gore to be found here. The most ludicrous visual we get is of a
dummy having its plastic head bashed repeatedly off a cliff side (this was
pretty amusing, all things considered, and proof that you can take the man out
of the outrageousness, but you can’t take the outrageousness out of the man;
not completely). The film’s weakest
point, ironically enough, is O’Neill. She’s certainly attractive enough, and can
pull off being anxious, but she has no real presence onscreen, otherwise. Thankfully, Fulci is enough of a visual stylist to keep things
interesting. It’s surprising to me that
the filmmaker doesn’t get more respect because of work like this (maybe because
it was so infrequent in his oeuvre), but he deserves it, as does this film.
MVT: Fulci shows some real restraint here, proving that ridiculous gore
wasn’t the only thing he could do very well when given the chance.
Make or Break: The prologue
sets up the premise nicely, and it’s as enigmatic as it is audacious.
Score: 7/10
No comments:
Post a Comment