Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Island Of Terror (1966)

Back before the internet, back before the proliferation of cult toys, back before the rise of comic book culture to regal status, kids had essentially two things when it came to playtime: really shitty toys and their imaginations.  Not all of the toys were shitty, to be fair.  Some were even well-designed and encouraged some form of thought (whether that be through their scarcity or intent, I can’t say, though I doubt the latter), and when we would play War, the toy guns weren’t colored like a pack of bubble gum; they actually looked like guns (shocking today in a world brimming over with street gangs and overzealous police).  I fondly remember a line of toys called Pocket Super Heroes and had quite a few of them.  Seeing photos of them now, I have to say that said fondness is clearly fogged by nostalgia, however when I was a child there was no other way to get an action figure of a character like Aquaman or the Green Goblin, so that does need to be taken into account.

Still, like Moses (Sidney Dawson) in Raising Arizona said, “…when there was no crawdad to be found, we ate sand.”  And so it was, especially for those of us who loved monsters.  Oh, there were the odd model kits, and you could probably find a nice hard rubber gorilla that you could pretend was King Kong, but characters like Godzilla and his cohorts were simply not to be found (unless of course you had a store nearby that imported toys and a wad of cash in your pockets; I had neither).  There are reasons why phrases like “necessity is the mother of invention” are coined, and this is just such a one.  Since I wouldn’t even lay eyes on a Hedorah action figure until well into my adulthood, I had no option but to make one.  Armed with crayons and paper, I drew all of my favorite monsters which were non-extant in action figure form (that’s a lot of monsters), cut them out, and used those for my monster mash flights of fancy.  I even drew cityscapes for them to demolish.  

The pros and cons should be readily apparent.  Being made of paper, they were pretty fragile, but the beauty of this particular coin’s flip side is that they were also cheaply re-attainable.  Another downside was that if you admired the way a certain likeness came out and that “figure” got wrecked, the odds on you being able to reproduce said likeness the way that caught your eye the first time were slim (conversely, there was also the chance that the new one would catch your fancy more).  It was like those drawn out army fights with which so many of us used to litter our notebooks, but with moveable “parts” (and before things like Presto Magix [another toy I relished] though not before Colorforms, which is probably where the inspiration for the former came from anyway). I’m going to such lengths with this because some of the creatures I created via loose leaf were Silicates from Terence Fisher’s Island Of Terror.  I don’t remember if mine were Godzilla-sized, but I would guess so.  Everything else was back then.

Off the coast of Ireland lies Petrie’s Island, a small, agrarian community whereupon resides the hermitic Dr. Phillips (Peter Forbes-Robertson).  Phillips’ cancer research goes slightly awry (with a flash of white and red and a wicked sting on the soundtrack), and soon thereafter local villager Ian Bellows (Liam Gaffney) is found with no bones in his body and no apparent wounds.  Island doctor Reginald Landers (Eddie Byrne) calls upon pathologist Dr. Brian Stanley (Peter Cushing) who calls upon bone disease specialist Dr. David West (Edward Judd) whom they interrupt while working on a bone of a different sort with paramour Toni Merrill (Carole Grey).  The lot takes off for the island and discover just how awry Phillips’ research has gone.

This is one of those films that skirts the line between traditional and unusual Horror.  After all, it was around this time we got a Were-Moth in The Blood Beast Terror (also with Cushing), a Were-Snake in The Reptile, and a Were-Gorgon in…um…The Gorgon.  But what Island Of Terror does, and to my mind does so well, is does a marvelous job of balancing its two aspects.  The Petrie’s Island community is small, its characters very traditional, even superstitious in some ways.  They have no phones, a problematic power generator, and a supply boat that comes by once a week; the perfect setup for a Horror film.    The manse where Phillips’ lab is housed could easily have been a hand-me-down from Dr. Frankenstein (“it looks like Wuthering Heights”), with its gothic masonry and twisting stairways.  Yet the rooms where Phillips’ experiments are performed are modern, antiseptic, metallic.  And even here, there are concessions with tanks full of bubbling, brightly colored water (or whatever).  As a compromise to modern times, we get some nice effects work with the boneless bodies, and there’s even a nice, quick gore shot when a character loses an appendage (replete with a nifty spurt of blood).  The film takes its time in its pacing, allowing the mystery to play out of its own volition.  This isn’t a sprint, it’s a marathon, and even though the audience knows that the explanation is going to be outlandish to at least some degree, they are engaged by the asking of questions, the compiling of the monster’s profile.

The Silicates themselves are clearly an example of Body Horror (and a fairly early instance to my mind, although I also think cases could be made that a whole slew of Horror films could be considered Body Horror).  They are artificial life intended to eradicate cancer, but this is one of those times where the cure is arguably worse than the disease (think: Dr. Raglan’s Psychoplasmics from The Brood).  They are cells enlarged and outside the body.  They divide like cells (with the help of a great deal of chicken noodle soup), and they attack organisms like any aberrant bodies but from the outside in (rather than preying on individuals from the inside out, yet they are still exemplars of the body in revolt, even while not being naturally occurring).  Silicates have no intellect, no reasoning.  They are pure of purpose.  They live only to eat and propagate.  Nevertheless, they are an unfortunate byproduct of mankind’s search for answers, but when confronted with the concept that there are some areas in which men shouldn’t meddle, David pulls a Quatermass and offers the rebuttal, “Science has its risks.  But the risks aren’t enough to hinder progress.”  There is the acknowledgement that these things happen, but there also doesn’t seem to be any indication that precautions need to be taken to prevent their recurrence.  It’s almost as if the creation of monsters is something we just have to live with, even though we’re the ones who create them.  

MVT:  I love the Silicates.  They’re gross and silly and visually interesting.  And did I mention that chicken noodle soup pours out of them when they divide?  It’s disgusting and delicious, all at once.

Make Or Break:  The Make is the cell division scene.  See above.

Score:  7/10               

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Episode #290: Jodoworsky's Dune

Welcome back for another episode of the GGtMC!!!

This week Will and Sammy bring you a special episode, we had the privilege of seeing Jodoworsky's Dune (2013) directed by Frank Pavich. We also had the opportunity to speak with one of the producers Stephen Scarlata, or as we know him in the community...Neck!!! We want to thanks him for thinking of us!!!

Direct download: ggtmc_290.mp3

Emails to midnitecinema@gmail.com

Adios!!!


Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The Hunchback Of The Morgue (1973)

I went to a local Oktoberfest event exactly one time, and I can honestly tell you that I have no burning desire to go to another one.  It was held at a casino, with the tents and concessions set up on a racetrack outside.  Parking was insanely horrible.  Everything was exceptionally expensive.  Everything had to be purchased with tickets, like it was any day but Dorr-Oliver Day at Angela Park (if you were never there the joke is lost, but it’s my introduction, so…), and they were a pain in the ass to get.  Then there were the beer tents.  The wait in line was thirty minutes minimum (maybe I just blocked out anything after thirty).  The lines weren’t actually lines so much as gaggles, which of course lend themselves to assholes cutting in front of you.  The serving wenches were nice, I’ll grant you, and the beer was good (the one pitcher I bought), but the wild inconvenience of the whole thing put me off in a big way.

Don’t misread my frustration as surprise.  I half-expected this to suck but held out hope it wouldn’t (part the hopeless romantic in me, part confirmation bias, perhaps?).  Anyone who knows me knows I’m not a man who craves instant gratification, and I have no problems waiting my turn for anything.  But some things are simply more trouble than they’re worth, and this was one of them.  Now, if they had serving wenches floating around the place with giant steins like in Javier Aguirre’s The Hunchback Of The Morgue (aka El Jorobado De La Morgue), maybe this little affair wouldn’t have been such a cluster fuck the first go round.  It’s possible things have improved in subsequent years.  I know I won’t be finding out one way or the other.

Wolfgang Gotho (Paul Naschy) is the titular character who hangs around his small German town at night watching students get plastered in the local pub before returning to the hospital.  There he dotes on the lovely Ilse (Maria Elena Arpon), the only person to ever show him kindness (everyone is exceedingly cruel to our protagonist, with even a group of children hurling rocks at the poor bastard while they taunt him).  But Ilse is a terminal case (tuberculosis?  Dr. Tauchner [Victor Alcazar] mentions her lungs being destroyed, but that’s all we get), and once she goes, life for Gotho doesn’t just go off the track; it sticks its tongue on the proverbial third rail.

Out of all the classic “monsters” made famous primarily in Universal’s golden years, the hunchback occupies a special place.  Normally relegated to assistant status for the requisite mad scientist, this knotted up little man (or woman; let us not dismiss Jane Adams as Nina in 1945’s House Of Dracula) is inherently sympathetic.  This is not to say that they can’t be evil.  Dwight Frye’s Fritz was a sadistic little fellow.  Bela Lugosi’s Ygor was bent on vengeance.  Still, audiences are predisposed to gravitate toward those who are tortured and lonely, the most famous of these being Quasimodo from Victor Hugo’s The Hunchback Of Notre Dame, perfectly embodied (for me, at least) by Charles Laughton in William Dieterle’s 1939 adaptation.  We, most of us, cannot truly fathom what going through life with a deformity such as that is like, and even though the person with the humpback may think nothing of it, it makes us uncomfortable, and so we feel bad for them.  We pity them for them.  It reinforces our sense of kindness and makes us feel better about ourselves in the most selfish of ways.  I think it could be safely argued that no one plays on that sympathy more than Naschy and company here.  Not only is Gotho reviled by every single person he comes across (with two exceptions) for his physical malformation, but he is also mentally handicapped on top of it all.  It’s a one-two punch for plucking at the viewer’s compassion.  

Yes, Gotho is unjustly hated, but he is earnest, and it is his simplicity which leads to much of the film’s violence and its more grotesque aspects.  While picking flowers for Ilse, Gotho is teased by some med students, and this leads to an altercation where the hunchback whoops ass on all of them (or just most of them).  After Ilse’s boyfriend Udo (Fernando Sotuela) dies in a drunken stupor, Gotho delights in hacking pieces off his body in the morgue.  When two attendants try to steal the necklace from Ilse’s corpse, Gotho reaches for a handy axe.  Dr. Orla (Alberto Dalbes) has convinced Gotho that he can create a new Ilse if Gotho will bring fresh corpses and victims for his experiments.  It’s this twisting of a simple mind which should prompt our deepest emotions, and to some degree it does.  Nevertheless, it also marks Gotho as a character who must be punished.  His actions are not accidental (though it could be argued that they are born of emotional outbursts more than anything), and even while he does not fully understand what he is doing or why, he does it all the same.  Gotho’s story was never going to be a happy one.  If you’ve ever seen a Naschy film, you knew that already.  But here you get the feeling that he is being punished not only for the evil he commits but also for simply being born the way he was, physically, mentally, and emotionally.  There’s little room for monsters of any stripe in the cinematic world of Paul Naschy.

The film also deals to some extent with aspects of manhood.  The students who mistreat Gotho are always getting drunk and carousing in pubs.  In fact, the film opens with Udo and a couple of friends seeing who can drink the most beer fastest.  Naturally, Udo wins.  Not only is he cock of the walk in the pub, but he has the heart of Ilse, thus making him top of the heap in the masculinity department to Gotho’s mind.  Even after Udo is gone, Gotho can’t measure up (he is, after all, intimidated by children).  After running into Dr. Elke (Rosanna Yanni), the hunchback grovels at her feet, hardly cutting the most dashing of figures.  And yet Elke loves Gotho, no matter how improbable this pairing may seem to audiences (and how little screen time is devoted to it, but (again) that’s a Naschy film for you.  She explains the attraction with the line, “once in a while, faithfulness and love surpass beauty.”  And if you believe that one, I have a bridge I’d like to sell you.  Of course, once Gotho does stand up and do what’s right, the damage has already been done and is irreversible.  Ultimately, this hunchback never quite discovers his inner man.  He just discovers his inner human (and the difference between the two could arguably be the film’s central theme).  That it had been there from the beginning makes it all the more tragic.

MVT:  If all you heard of this film was its title, you would likely think it was a pretty tame affair.  It is anything but.  There is a perverse, sadistic streak a mile wide running through every frame of the movie, and the filmmakers never shy away from the gore.  Juicy.

Make Or Break:  The Make is the scene where Gotho takes a couple bits off Udo’s corpse.  The glee he shows sawing away at his rival’s extremities tells us all we need to know, if not about Gotho’s character then certainly about the screws loose or missing from the heads of this movie’s creators.  And I haven’t even detailed the more outré portions of this gem.

Score:  6.75/10         

Monday, June 2, 2014

The Cinema Snob Movie (2012)




Directed by: Ryan Mitchelle
Runtime: 122 minutes


For a change of pace I am going to provide some background instead of going on about nothing to cover the fact I never know how to start these things. Brad Jones plays The Cinema Snob, an extremely uptight movie connoisseur that is forced to watch the exploitation films from the 1930's to the 1980's. Aside from the exploitation movie reviews Brad Jones also reviews fast food, odd food and drinks, movies opening at midnight with his friends, and he also makes movies.

Craig Golightly is a fan of exploitation cinema, an aspiring exploitation script writer, and creator of the film Black Angus. Black Angus is a blaxploitation film about a 70's dico roller skater out to avenge the death of family. Despite how awesome this movie sounds Craig and his friend Neil Hall are having problems getting the movie made. They don't have an African American leading man, locations that could stand in for 70's and no filming permits.

To get this movie made Craig meets with Dan Phillips, the man who approves film permits and self appointed guardian of quality art, in attempt to make Black Angus. Dan is less than thrilled about Black Angus and tells Craig to see him again when he has a real movie idea. Neil does much better and convinces a former high school class mate and successful business man Gene to help get the movie made. Gene also manages to get access to several sites for filming and gets them a leading man that will be perfect for Black Angus.

Dan finds out that Black Angus is still going ahead despite his efforts to kill the movie. So he hires the leading man to be the leading man in a play he is producing and promises to go out of his way to kill any attempt to make his movie. Craig reluctantly pretends to be Vincent Dawn, a monumental and annoying film snob, in an effort to infiltrate Dan's film club. Luckily Craig's acting skill allows him to convince Dan and the rest of the film club that he is one of them. He is then rewarded with a six hour viewing of Being John Malkovich. Two hours for the movie an four hours of interruptions through out the film to ask questions or to demonstrate how they understand the deeper meaning of the film.

The stupidity forces Craig outside for a smoke break where he meets Dan's wife Nancy. She gets the Vincent Dawn reference and the two of them hit it off. Elsewhere, the killer starts to pick off members of the film club in odd and amusing ways. This leads to Nancy attempting to solve the murders and taking Craig along for the ride. Meanwhile Niel is trying to find a way to exploit the situation and make Black Angus at the same time.

MVT: This film was made so someone who has never heard of The Cinema Snob, Argento films, Gialli films, and Fulci films to watch and not be left behind. 

Make or Break: What makes this movie for me is the dark humor though out this movie. The break would be pace drags at points and takes me out of the movie briefly.

Score: 8.5 out of 10